4 ms·
The parties examples only uses a static map (lame), they make no use of google maps or leaflets. Try using an infoWindow. You can't, it's not easy. You're produ
by 1qaz2wsx3edc 14y ago
The parties examples only uses a static map (lame), they make no use of google maps or leaflets. Try using an infoWindow. You can't, it's not easy. You're productive will be stone walled with the simplest of integration. (This is a limit of constant regions and how meteor handles controlling a piece of the dom). Working with maps or third party libraries is a common task.
So, given that common tasks become stone walled and meteor promises productive. I'm waiting for 1.0, meteor is all too young.
I do love some parts of the pattern. I'm surprised that it hasn't been done before; like years ago.
- javajosh 14y agoAs much as I dislike the whiny tone of your comment, you have a point: Meteor has problems integrating with some libraries. If a smart-package doesn't exist for it, the odds of it working are slim. (Try getting jquery ui to work...) Part of this is because the Meteor use of reactive programming is very different. Regarding the whining: projects like this take time and effort to create. Wanting something "a year ago" ignores the reality that this is what we have now, and for all it's warts, it's good!
- wavesounds 14y agoLots of non-standard packages here which are easily added like "mrt add jquery-ui" https://atmosphere.meteor.com/ https://atmosphere.meteor.com/
- MrBra 14y agoIt is also possible that while Meteor gets to 1.0 other frameworks will incorporate some of its features/patterns.. I'd check it from time to time just to know what it is doing...