4 ms·
> The owner shouldn't be able to "ransom" the name for an unfair price, either. Since there is a supply of n=1, please define what an "unfair" price is, if you
by chimeracoder 14y ago
> The owner shouldn't be able to "ransom" the name for an unfair price, either.
Since there is a supply of n=1, please define what an "unfair" price is, if you're not comfortable with defining it as the amount that Michelin is willing to pay.
- ajross 14y agoI can't tell if this is a joke or not. You don't think exploiting a monopoly position on a good whose value is defined by someone else's trademark is "unfair"? It's the very definition of unfair, sorry. The real world, and the law, recognize that. I'm disturbed that you don't. The prank is acceptable. The ransom is not.