3 ms·
I don't think that's a very warming idea. Feels kind of shady to me. Another step further and I'm expecting the service to remove other people's affiliate IDs a
by thorax 18y ago
I don't think that's a very warming idea. Feels kind of shady to me. Another step further and I'm expecting the service to remove other people's affiliate IDs and adding their own.
On other fronts, we offer one approach on tinyurl "differentiation" via http://tinyarro.ws http://tinyarro.ws (super-small unicode URLs). For minimalists, we did http://ri.ms http://ri.ms.
Not an overabundance of room nowadays to differentiate. But with TinyArrows, the concept is interesting enough to people that it has taken on a life of its own on Twitter, and we actually get a little traffic out of it to our other sites. But it's not enough traffic that I could recommend people spend much time on their own URL shrinkers (unless they're just bored and have a really compelling idea).
I suggest using the services as a feeder for leads for your other products-- I personally see the affiliate thing as a bit shady. The only cool place to do it is in those awful spam emails that spammers overload the URL shrinkers with to hide their target site-- you could steal their revenue. But then you're making money off of spam...
- mickt 18y agoTiny's not working properly for me, entering google.com give me this link: http://➡.ws/g http://➡.ws/g Either Firefox doesn't recognise it as a valid address, or my DNS doesn't?