3 ms·
I'm trying to understand why this has 52 points on HN. Creating a fake-DMCA takedown site is a great idea, but this is a slap-dab job. IMO, it lacks the legiti
by csharpminor 14y ago
I'm trying to understand why this has 52 points on HN. Creating a fake-DMCA takedown site is a great idea, but this is a slap-dab job.
IMO, it lacks the legitimacy to attract any users. I personally would feel in better hands calling one of those skeezy personal injury law-firms that advertises on daytime TV than submitting my information to a random web form.
Looking forward to seeing improvements//
- dweekly 14y agoI'd love to field concrete suggestions for how to improve the likelihood of A) getting in front of people who have received bad takedowns and B) convincing them to get in touch / share information about their case. Friendlier copy? Actual design? Fewer questions?