"he pretty much gives all the info on how to create the attack" And the more disruptive the attack the better. Because it shall help have better process put in

"he pretty much gives all the info on how to create the attack" And the more disruptive the attack the better. Because it shall help have better process put into place, at every level, to mitigate such issues in the future. The last thing I want is a deadly packet not breaking havoc only because it's payload is not known. If a single packet can bring down a big part of the net, then by all means make it happen and make it as bad you can. And then we can start thinking about how to build a more reliable and more secure net.