3 ms·
> Someone who bullies women programmers Whoa...slow down there, hoss. Steve explained that his tweet about @harthur's replace utility was not meant to dispara
by qohen 14y ago
> Someone who bullies women programmers
Whoa...slow down there, hoss.
Steve explained that his tweet about @harthur's replace utility was not meant to disparage its author, or its code, but was meant to express his feelings about Node (i.e. the ecosystem for which replace was written). And, he apologized, "unequivocably", for the fact that his tweet had caused pain to @harthur:
http://blog.steveklabnik.com/posts/2013-01-23-node http://blog.steveklabnik.com/posts/2013-01-23-node
And, @harthur then said this in a followup to her original post,
http://harthur.wordpress.com/2013/02/01/open-source-rocks-follow-up/ http://harthur.wordpress.com/2013/02/01/open-source-rocks-fo...
My last blog post was quite a downer, so I want to do a short follow up for posterity.
First of all, there were some nice responses to it from Steve Klabnik and especially Corey Haines, who gave a very sincere straight-up apology. Several people have told me they are usually very nice, so keep that in mind.
So, your characterization appears to be incorrect and unfair.
- qohen 14y ago(In fact, the only thing Steve perhaps can be criticized for, in my view, is for using the word, "unequivocably" -- which is non-standard -- instead of, "unequivocally", when writing his apology. :-) http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/69930/unequivocably-vs-unequivocally http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/69930/unequivocab... )
- steveklabnik 14y agoThanks. I just can't type. Fixing. (I didn't even know that people said 'unequivocably.')
- philwelch 14y agoIntentions don't matter. I'm glad harthur was magnanimous enough to accept the apology, but that doesn't really change much.