4 ms·
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specious http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specious 1 obsolete : showy 2: having deceptive attraction or allu
by PuercoPop 14y ago
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specious http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specious
1 obsolete : showy
2: having deceptive attraction or allure
3: having a false look of truth or genuineness : sophistic <specious reasoning>
So instead of taking the common meaning of specious, a deceptively attractive benchmark we have to go to a less common use of specious in order to construct an specious argument about the proper use of specious? Nevermind that it is distracting from the main point of the discussion about benchmarks in the context of Topaz.
- tomcorrigan 14y agoIt depends where you look for the common meaning. To native English speakers in the UK, Australia, New Zealand (ie outside North America, coincidentally including the country where the English language developed) specious has one very clear meaning I would also direct you to the usage examples in your link. All of which use specious in a context that implies deception of outright falsity. I have never ever seen specious used synonymously with obsolescence.
- svachalek 14y agoI read that as "showy (obsolete)". Either way, amalag's says "wrong", the other says "deceptive" and "false", I'm not sure what anyone's arguing about. Specious data has no value.
- victorh 14y agoI disagree with your argument! If inventing the language meant you got to choose all the definitions we wouldn't have English in the first place. Shift happens. I don't think this particular usage is common, though.
- losvedir 14y agoFor what it's worth, amalog's definition of "specious" is the one I'm familiar with. My girlfriend recently quizzed me on her GRE words with that one, and my definition was the given one, too. So I'd argue that amalog's definition IS the common one.