4 ms·
Mudil, This is not a court. You do not have a need to support your case. By making the name public you are just making yourself look bad. That is why I made po
by orangethirty 14y ago
Mudil,
This is not a court. You do not have a need to support your case. By making the name public you are just making yourself look bad. That is why I made point 7. Don't argue. Delete this post while you can. Save yourself the trouble.
- true_religion 14y agoI don't agree. Freelancers who work online are used to having their name out there. It's part and parcel of the reputation systems built by Freelancer.com, Guru, and E-lance. Once work is completed, you get a public review. To me, his main legitimate complaint is that Freelancer.com didn't allow him to leave a review, so he has to turn to taking his story to the wider public. I don't really agree with his story, but he does have a write to name whom he has worked with in the past.
- orangethirty 14y agoSure, though like I said, he is posting his side of the story. This could even be considered as libel by some lawyers. That is why you just don't post stuff like this publicly. The legal risk is too big.