3 ms·
Absolutely! I didnt mean to derail from your main point. I've worked with LaserMotive so I'm reasonably familiar with their technology. You can make a ping-pon
by asynchronous13 14y ago
Absolutely! I didnt mean to derail from your main point. I've worked with LaserMotive so I'm reasonably familiar with their technology.
You can make a ping-pong ball hover in an upward column of air, but I wouldn't call the ping-pong ball a UAV. It's just semantics, but I think the term implies a certain level of autonomy. Another example, there are many radio controlled aircraft in the hobby world that I would not call UAVs. One could take the same r/c vehicle, integrate an autopilot, and then UAV might be a more appropriate term for it.
- mapt 14y agoI ended up formalizing it into a number of categories: http://www.dronepedia.com/index.php?title=Autopilot_concepts http://www.dronepedia.com/index.php?title=Autopilot_concepts In my view, anything with Return To Home level autopilot and above could reasonably be considered a UAV. This generally requires a 6-9DOF IMU, an altimeter, and a GPS receiver.