5 ms·

How would you handle employee review in such a case? Managers could no longer review employees, it would cause too much gaming the system in either retaliatory

• blablabla123 14y ago
  In my opinion the reviewing needs to be led and executed by HR. (Or by a manager that is at least one level higher - but forget that, those folks don't have time anyway) That HR doesn't understand what you are doing is a bad excuse, depending on the job you might be the only person knowing exactly what you are doing. Anyway, I feel like the manager doing the review is absolutely unfair - at least not in a sufficiently large organization. >it would cause too much gaming the system in either retaliatory This is already the case. When your manager does the review, your review is limited by the manager.
• huherto 14y ago
  I would do periodic organization culture assessments by an outside and professional firm. Things like, who is respected, who is hated, who is consider incapable, who people enjoy working with. etc. As a consultant I worked for several large IT organizations, and I got to see a lot of very toxic people. Some were really high up, some middle managers. They were assholes with everybody but I bet they were very nice to their own bosses, and worked very hard at masking their incompetence. Those people can really screw the organizational culture.
• InclinedPlane 14y ago
  Are you of the opinion that there is an acceptable level of gaming the system today?