3 ms·
Same impression here. The huge header graphics are a joke, I'm at a 1920x1600 screen but still get the vertical scrollbar at my normal browser-size. I also fi
by moe 18y ago
Same impression here.
The huge header graphics are a joke, I'm at a 1920x1600 screen but still get the vertical scrollbar at my normal browser-size.
I also find all offered layouts annoyingly cluttered and uncomfortable to read. The artsy colors and low contrast may work for a webdesign studio portfolio - but I'll prefer the current mozilla.org over each of them any day.
- beaucollins 18y agoSince when were vertical scrollbars bad?
- moe 18y agoThey are not inherently bad. It's just a bad idea to have a header graphic take up half of the screen, pushing most of the content below the fold...
- wmeredith 18y agoOh, lord. Go do layout for a newspaper. There IS NO FOLD... http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of
- moe 18y agoYes, there is. The fold is exactly where my browser viewport ends. Worse yet, google says that most people don't look beyond the third result. So the mental fold is even higher than that.