Wahl and Ammann 2007 does not appear to adequately address gd1's points. It just applies a slightly different statistical approach using the same flawed premise

Wahl and Ammann 2007 does not appear to adequately address gd1's points. It just applies a slightly different statistical approach using the same flawed premise. There are countless arguments and rebuttals to be found on both sides of the debate, but I've found the ones below to be particularly helpful: Pro Hockey Stick: [1] Original MBH98 paper (PDF): http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/MannBradleyHughes1998.pdf http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers... [2] Wahl and Ammann 2007 (PDF): http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/ammann/millennium/refs/Wahl_ClimChange2007.pdf http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/ammann/millennium/refs/Wahl_Clim... [3] Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_controversy [4] Real Climate Hockey Stick "Dummies Guide" (PDF): http://www.realclimate.org/dummies.pdf http://www.realclimate.org/dummies.pdf Skeptical of Hockey Stick: [5] Skeptic blog post "Casper and the Jesus Paper": http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2008/8/11/caspar-and-the-jesus-paper.html http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2008/8/11/caspar-and-... [6] "The Hockey Stick Illusions" book (same skeptic author): http://www.amazon.com/The-Hockey-Stick-Illusion-Climategate/dp/1906768358/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top http://www.amazon.com/The-Hockey-Stick-Illusion-Climategate/... [7] McIntyre & McKitrick 2003 (PDF): http://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2005/09/mcintyre.mckitrick.2003.pdf http://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2005/09/mcintyre.mck...