3 ms·
This can really be broken because you can redefine the numeric constructor of 1 to return false and thus get around the while(1). However, if for(;;) was used,
by twistedpair 14y ago
This can really be broken because you can redefine the numeric constructor of 1 to return false and thus get around the while(1). However, if for(;;) was used, then you cannot get around it. ;)
- aleem 14y agoI'm curious--how would you redefine it? Could you share a code snippet or reference?