3 ms·
Putting an intermediary currency in between purchaser and product is always worse for the consumers. 1. There is the leftover phenomenon where you have currenc
by rwanghacker 14y ago
Putting an intermediary currency in between purchaser and product is always worse for the consumers.
1. There is the leftover phenomenon where you have currency leftover and you can't spend it anywhere else
2. Or everytime you need to make a purchase, you switch the exact amount out for your purchase which adds additional step of useless process
- niggler 14y agoThere's one added benefit, but its not clear who this accreted to: reduced credit card fees. Having one large charge is generally more efficient than many small charges, and if the savings are used to reduce fees or increase developer percentage then this is a good thing.
- picklefish 14y agoI would prefer the "wallet" method that steam uses. You require people put at least $5 in the wallet tied to their account. It's easy to remove the leftover balance because the first time you buy something over $5 it takes money from the wallet and charges you the rest leaving $0 in wallet.