4 ms·
That StackOverflow post is hilarious. Who actually justifies slow performance by quoting the limitations of humans ? Here's a thought for that genius. What if
by taligent 14y ago
That StackOverflow post is hilarious. Who actually justifies slow performance by quoting the limitations of humans ?
Here's a thought for that genius. What if I am showing a dynamic graph with that table .. or I have complex rows .. or animations .. or a trillion other use cases that he can't seem to envisage ? And people on slow computers or mobile devices obviously aren't welcome.
Anyway here's a performance comparison:
http://jsperf.com/angular-vs-knockout-vs-ember/82 http://jsperf.com/angular-vs-knockout-vs-ember/82
AngularJS does need some work. But so does every framework. Far better to be honest and upfront about your faults so you don't waste your user's time.
- CamShaft 14y agoThat jsperf wasn't very accurate. The ember run loop holds all changes and waits for the program to execute before writing to the dom, which is great. Angular does this too by default unless you force it with $scope.$digest(); which is what they've got here. I edited it to show what's really happening http://jsperf.com/angular-vs-knockout-vs-ember/85 http://jsperf.com/angular-vs-knockout-vs-ember/85
- salmanapk 14y agoI don't find that post hilarious but good thing: they no longer need to do the dirty-checking in the latest Chrome[1], which will improve performance significantly. 1: https://plus.google.com/112439678898563138768/posts/RZKRBiGXvR2 https://plus.google.com/112439678898563138768/posts/RZKRBiGX...