3 ms·
It does look fun. But the programming done here is very imperative and procedural in nature. Not to say it can't or shouldn't be done. It just doesn't seem lik
by galaktor 14y ago
It does look fun.
But the programming done here is very imperative and procedural in nature. Not to say it can't or shouldn't be done. It just doesn't seem like a very good case for using a functional programming language, although the title seems to imply that. Anybody attempting to learn Clojure this way is probably missing out on the actual merits of functional programming.
- calibraxis 14y agoI think this demonstrates how Clojure lends itself to situations which are all about side-effects. And in particular demonstrates highly interactive REPL-based development.