Yeah, there is no room for abuse in that little gem. The US Supreme Court has already decided at least once that the AUMF could not be cited in defense of the

Yeah, there is no room for abuse in that little gem. The US Supreme Court has already decided at least once that the AUMF could not be cited in defense of the goverment's actions (in this case, military tribunals) because those actions violated the principles of the Geneva Conventions, among others. That's the whole problem with this. The accused never get a chance to defend themselves in court, are presumed guilty and sentenced without any reasonable defense.