4 ms·

Brilliant. My only concern is that the completion suggestions could cover text on other lines that I might be looking at, but I suppose this will serve to enco

by jlgreco 14y ago

Brilliant. My only concern is that the completion suggestions could cover text on other lines that I might be looking at, but I suppose this will serve to encourage me to stay out of insert mode unless necessary. Edit: Compared to other Vim plugins the installation is a pain in the ass, but it really is as quick as it claims, even on my whoa-fully underpowered eeepc. One suggestion: when I use SuperTab the name of the file that the suggestion is coming from appears to the right of the suggestion. That would be rather nice to have in this as well, if possible. Otherwise this is perfect, I think I'm finally done with SuperTab. Edit 2 (sorry): This seems to be ignoring words that are in comments, and not completing anything when editing a comment. Is this toggle-able behavior?

gurraman 14y ago
autocomplop[1] is easier to install, but not as sophisticated. I just installed it to see if I like the idea of having completions pop up automatically. [1] https://bitbucket.org/ns9tks/vim-autocomplpop/ https://bitbucket.org/ns9tks/vim-autocomplpop/
- syncontrol 14y ago
  ACP would be great if it weren't slow and dev-dead. Also doesn't fuzzy-match.
  - eikenberry 14y ago
    I forked autocomplpop a while back to fix a couple issues and make it easier to add new language support. Never noticed a speed issue. I always preferred acp vs the others due to its simplicity. https://github.com/eikenberry/acp https://github.com/eikenberry/acp
    - johncoltrane 14y ago
      Oooh, nice to hear. I've done a bunch of mods to make ACP work with JS a while ago (https://github.com/romainl/dotvim/blob/master/bundle/autocomplpop/autoload/acp.vim#L130 https://github.com/romainl/dotvim/blob/master/bundle/autocom...) but I'll check your version.
  - johncoltrane 14y ago
    It isn't slow, here. YMMV.
- jlgreco 14y ago
  Aye. I remember having problems with autocomplop though when I had a rather large amounts of text open at once; YouCompleteMe seems like an improvement in that regard though. Handled `vim src/**/*.go` quite nicely.
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]

by jlgreco 14y ago

gurraman 14y ago

autocomplop[1] is easier to install, but not as sophisticated. I just installed it to see if I like the idea of having completions pop up automatically. [1] https://bitbucket.org/ns9tks/vim-autocomplpop/ https://bitbucket.org/ns9tks/vim-autocomplpop/

syncontrol 14y ago
ACP would be great if it weren't slow and dev-dead. Also doesn't fuzzy-match.
- eikenberry 14y ago
  I forked autocomplpop a while back to fix a couple issues and make it easier to add new language support. Never noticed a speed issue. I always preferred acp vs the others due to its simplicity. https://github.com/eikenberry/acp https://github.com/eikenberry/acp
  - johncoltrane 14y ago
    Oooh, nice to hear. I've done a bunch of mods to make ACP work with JS a while ago (https://github.com/romainl/dotvim/blob/master/bundle/autocomplpop/autoload/acp.vim#L130 https://github.com/romainl/dotvim/blob/master/bundle/autocom...) but I'll check your version.
- johncoltrane 14y ago
  It isn't slow, here. YMMV.
jlgreco 14y ago
Aye. I remember having problems with autocomplop though when I had a rather large amounts of text open at once; YouCompleteMe seems like an improvement in that regard though. Handled `vim src/**/*.go` quite nicely.

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]