3 ms·
"not authorized under the constitution" Can you give some specifics about why this is so?
by sxcurry 14y ago
"not authorized under the constitution"
Can you give some specifics about why this is so?
- tptacek 14y agoHere you can reasonably expect to end up litigating Alexander Hamilton with someone who several months ago said this in an HN comment: "Maybury v Madison contained a criminal action on the part of the supreme court where they usurped power that did not belong to them, under the constitution, and where they correctly ruled that unconstitutional laws are invalid the moment they are signed."