3 ms·
dear wise downvoters, do you downvote on pure reflex ? did you bother reading the article ? can you venture a guess why mco ( not s&p but mco ) fell ? in the ve
by dxbydt 14y ago
dear wise downvoters, do you downvote on pure reflex ? did you bother reading the article ? can you venture a guess why mco ( not s&p but mco ) fell ? in the very high likelihood that mco ( again, not s&p, but mco) bounces back tomorrow, isn't this a nice buying op ? moody's has not been in lockstep with s&p w.r.t cdo ratings.
- logn 14y agoI think they downvoted because they're hackers reading this who have no idea about what you wrote and downvoted much like the high school bully punching you for saying something nerdy. Please, in the future just complain about gov't injustice: much better for karma.
- gnosis 14y agoI downvoted because I have no interest in seeing stock trading tips on HN. This is not a stock trading forum, and those kinds of comments don't belong here.
- jlarocco 14y agoIn all fairness, the article itself doesn't have much business being on HN, either. It seems a little unfair to click through to the comments on an off-topic article and then down vote the comments for also being off-topic.
- anigbrowl 14y agoA reasonable observation. I posted it here because it (IMHO) points to a systematic problem in the operation of markets - a flaw in our economic operating software, as it were.