3 ms·
But I've tried Haskell, and I do like it! "X has nothing on Y" means X is not superior to Y. Not "X couldn't tie Y's shoelaces."
by mdemare 18y ago
But I've tried Haskell, and I do like it!
"X has nothing on Y" means X is not superior to Y. Not "X couldn't tie Y's shoelaces."
- tome 18y agoThe meaning is much closer to the latter in my experience.