4 ms·

This was posted almost a week ago - http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5135883 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5135883

• mercuryrising 14y ago
  The title on this one is better without context.
  • scoot 14y ago
    Yes, although it needs a '(sic)' for the poor grammar in the original; I thought the submitter had made the mistake until I clicked through to the article.
    • gruseom 14y ago
      If you mean the "have", that's not poor grammar – it's correct, though more common in Britain than in the U.S.
      • deleted 14y ago
        [deleted]
      • deleted 14y ago
        [deleted]