3 ms·
The Nordic Model is horrid in the long term. A better name would be the cut rose model. Take a demographic that has little more than one child per woman ferti
by VaedaStrike 14y ago
The Nordic Model is horrid in the long term.
A better name would be the cut rose model.
Take a demographic that has little more than one child per woman fertility rates, then, with per capita debt double what you have in the US achieve spectacularly glowing vital statistics (happy, healthy, literate people).
Again you have almost two adults per child, their spending plus the spending of the state which, overall (despite recent belt tightening) is twice per capita what you have in the US. Throw in a culture that's been largely mono-ethnic and with a population level that looks like a single relatively small State in the US and you have something that looks pretty right now but is completely unsustainable and will collapse a la Greece or worse as the present demographic of youth come into the workforce with massive debt obligations yet with none of the options their parents had.