5 ms·
Probably not that different, but that's no excuse to keep using bank switching on its core; it was usually painful, expensive, and limiting for the developers.
by Mahn 14y ago
Probably not that different, but that's no excuse to keep using bank switching on its core; it was usually painful, expensive, and limiting for the developers.
- ANTSANTS 14y agoI'd imagine bank-switching a large ROM into 32 KiB of address space imposes constraints similar to those imposed by loading data from a slow-as-molasses 2X CD-ROM drive into 2 MiB of RAM.