I looked at that graph like four times before I could even start to understand how somebody could make that mistake... The whole premise of the article is expa

I looked at that graph like four times before I could even start to understand how somebody could make that mistake... The whole premise of the article is expanding capacity and falling costs and he describes the graph as exemplifying this and then when I look at it I feel foolish. Glad to see I'm not the only one who noticed that. The debate has never been about aggregate capacity (not since the 1900's), but rather about last-mile access, and will continue to be until last-mile access is liberated; which may never happen.