4 ms·
I still have only used sublime text once, but I might try it out again soon just to get a better idea of what these features are that make it so much better. An
by spacelizard 14y ago
I still have only used sublime text once, but I might try it out again soon just to get a better idea of what these features are that make it so much better. And them I'm going to add them into vim.
I think that it is a serious problem that sublime text is proprietary. While it does support plugins, the one time I did use it I remember seeing several messages from plugin authors complaining that the sublime API does not support certain features that they wanted it to support, and that the sublime text authors refused to implement them. So to that effect I really think there is no benefit to using a proprietary text editor, no matter how many flashy features it has. I would rather just improve vim (and encourage others to do so) so that it is better than sublime text.
It also seems somewhat strange that sublime is proprietary considering how lax their licensing policy is. It doesn't seem to me like there is any financial or practical reason for it to be proprietary. To channel Stallman, the only thing I can reasonably conclude is that the author intends to attack his own users. It really disappoints me to see that this kind of project is being promoted as a replacement for free software editors.