> I also don't understand how "changing one's MAC or IP address [in order to circumvent] 'technological access measures'" doesn't constitute a violation in prin

> I also don't understand how "changing one's MAC or IP address [in order to circumvent] 'technological access measures'" doesn't constitute a violation in principle It is a violation in principle; the real world equivalent would be having a posted picture saying "DO NOT ADMIT THIS MAN INSIDE" but Aaron walks up wearing a ridiculous faux mustache and gets admitted anyways. IMHO it's explicitly whitelisted not because of the principle, but because it's the behavior Aaron employed that they're trying to make legal in the future.