>next time you write a post like this, I suggest explaining what is socialism in your post I believe linking to the wiki and clearly directing him to the exact

>next time you write a post like this, I suggest explaining what is socialism in your post I believe linking to the wiki and clearly directing him to the exact place in the wiki (the first line) communicates the information very effectively. Barrier to entry is zero and if he wants to keep reading he can go more in depth. >I don't see why if using the correct word is called "accurate," then using the wrong word is called "dogma" Using the wrong word is not, by definition, dogma. Dogma was inferred from other verbiage in his post, and is my opinion and the impression I got from his language. >I'd like you to imagine what Hacker News would be like if people corrected technical ignorance with... See above, -I don't really think this was technical ignorance. Of course I could be wrong, but that's not the premise I'm working with, or the impression I got. Hence the snark. But as I already mentioned, I shouldn't have bothered to reply at all to what I saw as a dogmatic post. I think there's and adage about what to do when you're coming up short with niceties that applies here...