4 ms·
Well, I think you're probably solving a different problem with the master/slave. If you're scaling out and caching because you're CPU limited then nothing chang
by jconley 18y ago
Well, I think you're probably solving a different problem with the master/slave. If you're scaling out and caching because you're CPU limited then nothing changes. If you're scaling out because your disks can't keep up with the parallel read/write traffic then I'm thinking you can drop the cache and master/slave in many cases (unless you want the hot server for HA).
- ShabbyDoo 18y agoI worked on a pretty big site where we read from the slaves and wrote to the master, but we were still on 4.1 with MyISAM. Given the current size of the iodrives we would have to shard a lot more than we were, especially for a few large tables. But, it would drastically reduce deployment complexity.