4 ms·
I'm talking about the interview, where he specifically said (and I paraphrase) "fomenting is against the law, but I did it anyways because the SEC is clueless."
by andrewljohnson 18y ago
I'm talking about the interview, where he specifically said (and I paraphrase) "fomenting is against the law, but I did it anyways because the SEC is clueless."
That was just one of a couple of crimes he admitted too, and I cite this one because he specifically said "I committed a crime."
What more do you need?
- kyochan 18y agoEvidence. If he goes on trial he could plead the fifth and prosecutor will need evidence to corroborate whether he actually did what he said.
- anamax 18y agoHow about some evidence that either of you actually knows the relevant law and evidence showing that his actions actually qualify? You need both. His statements aren't either.