5 ms·
Yeah, but that doesn't explain why even after 2 years - which is almost the same as backbone, it has had such a low adaption. PS: wary of sounding negative - I
by abhishiv 14y ago
Yeah, but that doesn't explain why even after 2 years - which is almost the same as backbone, it has had such a low adaption.
PS: wary of sounding negative - I am just trying to get someone help me convince them next week.
- Guillaume86 14y agoIt's just lack of communication IMO. I'm quite interested in JS frameworks and only learned about angular a few months ago. This framework doesn't get (yet) the attention it deserves but from what I've seen this last months it's improving.
- snprbob86 14y agoIt's just very different than what most GUI tools feel like. In some ways, it's more like a game engine loop than a UI toolkit's message pump. The lack of familiarity slows adoption, despite being, IMHO, vastly superior technology. See my thoughts on why Angular's approach is attractive here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5063986 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5063986
- brian-frichette 14y agoExcellent analogy. I've been using AngularJS for about six months, and I honestly never thought of it that way.