4 ms·
In my opinion, linkedin answers were far better than the groups. Groups are easy to start but hard to maintain and keep engaged. I have learnt that the best way
by codegeek 14y ago
In my opinion, linkedin answers were far better than the groups. Groups are easy to start but hard to maintain and keep engaged. I have learnt that the best way to keep audience focussed is to give specifics which answers can do better than a group. For example, creating a group called "Python developers" might attract a few folks but what do you do when you join it ? A more specific question like "What technology stack is used by python developers for web" will definitely attract a more engaged conversation.
- adrianhoward 14y agoIn my opinion, linkedin answers were far better than the groups That's damning with faint praise - being better than groups isn't a very high bar ;-)
- mnicole 14y agoSo true, are there any worth joining? The UX/web design/CSS ones are jokes and so are their [multiple] G+ counterparts.
- pestaa 14y agoThis is the first time I hear someone saying this about G+ groups. I've felt this way ever since people wanted to move to G+ just for its own sake.
- mnicole 14y agoYeah, I'm not sure if user-generated groups were the way to go with that one. I have no idea which of the ten with the same name are worth joining, so I don't join any at all.