3 ms·
Well, one conclusion we can draw from the article is that 90% of code is not considered good by author's standards (which I not only agree with but take one ste
by pestaa 14y ago
Well, one conclusion we can draw from the article is that 90% of code is not considered good by author's standards (which I not only agree with but take one step further), yet we weren't presented a case in which crap code could be mitigated.
I mean, when your employers insist on employing the bad engineers because they talk big jargon, that shows the Real Cost of Stupid Management more than anything else.
- blablabla123 14y ago>yet we weren't presented a case in which crap code could be mitigated. Is that possible anyway? I found the communication aspect an interesting point. But I wonder: what if the non-developers have bad communication skills? And how do you find out?
- pestaa 14y ago> Is that possible anyway? I believe so, we just have to train those who write decent code and willing to get better, and fire those who write and release their crap commercially.