3 ms·

>> but i am good with applied math << Really? http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5141025 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5141025 >> Please show me the ac

• Mithaldu 14y ago
  I know it can be easy to mistake that, but i said calculations intentionally. I was not asking for the code.
• Mithaldu 14y ago
  Okay, i worked it out, no thanks to yoo. Actually, i fucking worked it out IN SPITE of you. All your condescending hints and links and such were entirely bullshit and did not even remotely lead in the direction of explaining why the data seems dissonant. They were flat out orthogonal to the entire problem. The important thing which you did not bother to point here even once is that the comparisons on the overview page are done against the fastest programs of all languages, thus weighting the results by a factor that is simply not present when one language is compared directly against another. So, alright, the graphs do entirely make sense. Would you be open to a patch that reworks the language vs. language comparison pages in such a manner as to make this relationship obvious?
  • igouy 14y ago
    >> The important thing << Is stated in plain sight - twice - on the overview page.
    • Mithaldu 14y ago
      That still does not change that your presentation of the data is not consistent in all parts, namely the language comparison.