4 ms·
Hi, slava @ rethink here. People have been using Rethink for lots of projects, but there are still some showstoppers we have to work out (better docs notwithsta
by coffeemug 14y ago
Hi, slava @ rethink here. People have been using Rethink for lots of projects, but there are still some showstoppers we have to work out (better docs notwithstanding) -- remember, the product has been in the wild for less than 90 days.
What did you try to do with a many-to-many join? We could help you with writing the query, and could add syntax sugar to the language to make it easier if it makes sense.
- wiremine 14y ago> "remember, the product has been in the wild for less than 90 days." I hear you, and, FWIW, I'm excited about Rethink. To rephrase my question/observation: your article clearly lays out why you think it is better than MongoDB, using some quotes from people who agree with you. However, without some real-world data, it is still an argument rooted in theory. I like theory, but I also like to take real-world data to my bosses. Do you have any stats/examples that actual compare and demonstrate the performance? (I understand that wasn't the purpose of your article, just asking as a follow up). Regarding the many-to-many joins: I was just playing around with a contrived example: "a blog post has and belongs to many categories." Mainly I was just curious how to do it, I didn't _need_ it for anything. But, I couldn't figure out how to write it with the query language. I was using Python DSL, FWIW.
- coffeemug 14y agoI also hear you, there will be real data soon. We just want to be careful about making sure everything is sound before publishing information. As for many-to-many joins, I'll write something up about it, thanks!!