3 ms·
Right. From the post: "It’s not that we fundamentally disliked the previous approach. We just reached a point where we felt our goals weren’t best served by th
by hunvreus 14y ago
Right. From the post:
"It’s not that we fundamentally disliked the previous approach. We just reached a point where we felt our goals weren’t best served by this model. With lots of dynamic data, complex visualizations and a set of “static” interfaces, the traditional way was hindering our development speed and our ability to experiment."
It's very much targeted to our specific needs. Our approach is no more universal than Wordpress or Drupal. We have however harvested interesting conclusions from moving away from these CMS and that's mostly what I was interested in sharing.
With regards to using Worpress as a middle man for data centric apps, this is the kind of things we've done. My opinion: CMS are good at doing regular type of content CRUD based apps, but it breaks quickly. Moreover, most popular CMS are becoming bloated pretty quickly.
Have a look at Jekyll (http://github.com/mojombo/jekyll http://github.com/mojombo/jekyll), it's a much better fit for that.
- danso 14y agoYes, I love Jekyll and use it (with Octopress) myself...however, how easy is it for non-developers to use? I mean, I know it's easy...but even when non-developers can figure out HTML (nevermind Markdown), they are still more comfortable with a rich-text interface (until they try to embed code, of course...)
- hunvreus 14y agoWe have strong opinions on WYSIWYG and rich-text too: Avoid WYSIWYG Editors (http://wiredcraft.com/blog/avoid-wysiwyg-editors/index.html http://wiredcraft.com/blog/avoid-wysiwyg-editors/index.html).