The analogies on this post are strange, and the title is a little much. He's essentially arguing that well-intentioned design through technological advancements

The analogies on this post are strange, and the title is a little much. He's essentially arguing that well-intentioned design through technological advancements are hindering our growth and we should limit such innovation to ensure that there's still problems for us to solve and feel frustration by. But every solution introduces another problem, and I think we'd be idiots to stagnate growth over the assumption that people will learn faster if they have to jump the same hurdles as everyone else.