2 ms·
I think the concern about habeus corpus is valid, but more for those like the Gitmo detainees than Pfc. Manning per se. He leaked classified information, and ha
by mpyne 14y ago
I think the concern about habeus corpus is valid, but more for those like the Gitmo detainees than Pfc. Manning per se. He leaked classified information, and having to build an entire legal infrastructure and trial around that properly, without having any eventual sentence thrown out on a technicality, is going to take time and effort. Let's face it, if it were up the Army he'd already be convicted and spending the next couple of decades at least playing cards at Ft. Leavenworth.
As far as Lamo, I agree in general with the description of asshattery. But still, if Manning actually thought Lamo were a priest then I have to wonder about his capacity for critical thinking. And either way, I find it at least a bit ironic that Lamo managed to extract accurate information from Manning, under false pretenses, immediately after Manning extracted accurate information from the U.S. Government, under false pretenses. But only one of those two swore to protect the information in question under penalty of law.