3 ms·
You're making a point for ignorance and masquerading it as a legitimate disagreement on "fact", which has no variation. People who disagree with fact are litera
by dclowd9901 14y ago
You're making a point for ignorance and masquerading it as a legitimate disagreement on "fact", which has no variation. People who disagree with fact are literally mentally ill; delusional, not crazy like a fox.
To your second point, it's a work in progress.
- mseebach 14y agoNo, I'm making a point for not overloading the meaning of the word "fact" to something it can't actually support. There exists no validation or falsification of the statement, so there can be no fact - after all, it's about personal belief in a set of ideas that are themselves notoriously slippery to validate or falsify. It's a distracting point, and I shouldn't have included it - my main argument is the other part of my comment: That too often the facts of fact checks are, in fact, arguments.