> A 2% increase isn't very good IMO. I'd rather look for other efficiencies that won't cost me more money. A 2% improvement is a week's worth of effort in a ye

> A 2% increase isn't very good IMO. I'd rather look for other efficiencies that won't cost me more money. A 2% improvement is a week's worth of effort in a year at a full time job. Even a small improvement will be worth it unless there's a larger opportunity cost (such as using a substitute text editor that will yield even larger improvements), or if there's a risk of something going wrong (such as it being buggy and wiping out a week's worth of work). There's also switching costs of learning new features, which may be significant, depending on what you do and how you you'd use it. You should obviously make your own choice, but the rationalization can be valid, and 2% productivity improvement is nothing to sneeze at.