2 ms·

^ this reply can be summarized as "turning on the fan to spread shit on everyone else". This is a discussion about sublime, not other editors. And if other edi

by eyko 14y ago

^ this reply can be summarized as "turning on the fan to spread shit on everyone else". This is a discussion about sublime, not other editors. And if other editors have shortcomings, it's not an excuse. I also think that after paying for software the least you can expect is relatively bug-free code or quick updates to fix them, and a reduced number of crashes. That is, for software that has left beta to be labelled stable.

pretoriusB 14y ago
>^ this reply can be summarized as "turning on the fan to spread shit on everyone else". Yes, but only if by "spreading shit on everyone else" you mean: 1) a comparison between the speed of development/releases of ST (which was the very topic of this comment thread) and that of TextMate. 2) a generic statement that ST2 was as stable as any other competing browser. So, really NO, not at all. Oversensitive much? As if "the other editors" (of which I only mention _one_) are gonna feel hurt? >This is a discussion about sublime, not other editors. No discussion about anything can be made without relating to other things, especially of it's own category. If someone tells you "is this editor worth it" the only possible answer will take into account the other editors and what they offer.