3 ms·
It confuses the existing debate because there were already 60 minutes of comments, like my own, which reference this editorialization. Now that it has been obfu
by hemancuso 14y ago
It confuses the existing debate because there were already 60 minutes of comments, like my own, which reference this editorialization. Now that it has been obfuscated away this is slightly confused.
- vy8vWJlco 14y agoThen that's an interesting statistic in its own right: propaganda is the central debate in such cases. (It's not confusion, by definition.) If it were originally submitted to HN verbatim, with the word "terrorist," I would actually expect more of the focus of the debate to be on that reporting detail.