4 ms·
>Some of these programmers are terrible. Some are awesome. I dare say, just like in NYC? :) Only with a different percentage of terrible and awesome. >Do all
by pretoriusB 14y ago
>Some of these programmers are terrible. Some are awesome. I dare say, just like in NYC? :)
Only with a different percentage of terrible and awesome.
>Do all Indian/Pakistani/Egyptian/etc. hackers deserve to be painted with the same brush?
No, of course there are great Indian/Pakistani/etc programmers.
But generalising is not about being fair or accurate.
Generalisation is a compromise between being accurate and making a decision in time.
It's about being accurate _enough_ to make decisions as correct as possible without getting lost in the minutiae.
And the reason people generalise about Indian/etc programmers is because they have been burned a lot of times by them (and not as many times by NYC programmers).
If I had a nickel for every "please sir, solve my programming problem from me" type by an Indian programmer in an internet forum I would be rich. And a lot of those posters are not kids in school. They openly admit they work for a company, programming.
- kamelot 14y agoAgree with you that generalizations are statistical. However, that does not condone them. I don't want to take up racial examples, stereotypes don't help communities. Nuanced debate and constructive debate does. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization Perhaps the OP would have been better taking a less inflammatory and more rounded approach to low-cost economies, contributing in a global economy. I would have no beef with that. But yes, sensationalism, and awkward generalizations sells. :)
- rhizome 14y agoWhat does it mean to "condone" a calculation?