5 ms·
I've been telling my friends this: Graph Search is going to be the biggest privacy shitstorm we've ever seen, by a large margin. The only way it's not going to
by gfodor 14y ago
I've been telling my friends this: Graph Search is going to be the biggest privacy shitstorm we've ever seen, by a large margin. The only way it's not going to be is if Zuck et al cave quickly and lock it down to just search in your own network before the media picks it up. Basically Graph Search is the piece de resistance of Zuckerberg's vision for the world: ultimate transparency aided by algorithms to surface "public" information (ie, information the person posting it did not realize it was public.) It's the last big piece of the puzzle and closes the loop. The current product launch is just one "frontend" to these algorithms. Make no mistake the creation of this search engine is a huge inflection point since now things can be built on top of it.
The thesis (I think) has always been there would need to be a huge trial by fire, teaching the public about what information is actually public, and what it means to be "on the Internet" not via privacy settings, or blog posts, or tutorials, but by pure unadulterated necessity through fear. You will have to lock your shit down now or face the consequences of massive dissemination of that information. There will be no more friction. There will be causalities, and I think Facebook thinks it is an inevitability that "privacy through obscurity" becomes a thing of the past, so might as well be them to kill it. If you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet, particularly one that is going to be made by someone, so be it.
"Market efficiency" of social data is going to be achieved: just like when a news report comes out about a company its stock price instantly updates to reflect it, so to will the world itself, and the people in it, reflect the publication of personal information thanks to the ability of the world to see it via software like Graph Search. Anyone who wants to know anything about you or what you do will be able to, instantly, unless you understand the scope of the things you publish intimately.
- philwelch 14y agoI have an easy solution to that, personally: I don't share my deepest darkest secrets on social networking sites. I can't imagine anything I've posted to Facebook being a problem if it was all printed in tomorrow's New York Times. Maybe other people should take the same approach.
- icebraining 14y agoLet's hope other people don't post them for you. At least when email was the main social network, the effects of indiscreet friends and acquaintances didn't usually appear on Google.
- graue 14y agoThis. You can choose not to have a profile on Facebook, but you can't choose to live in a world where Facebook doesn't exist. I was an FB refuser for the longest time but would still get friends telling me about photos they saw of me on there. Those photos might be 100% public and I would have no control. We're all affected, unless we literally have zero friends, friends of friends, colleagues or family members who use Facebook — good luck with that.
- philwelch 14y agoMaybe it's to my advantage that I'm not in any kind of closet, but I also don't share my deepest darkest secrets with people I don't trust implicitly.
- gfodor 14y agoIt's not exactly your "deepest, darkest secrets" you need to be worried about. Do you really want your boss to know your interests? Do you really want your ex-girlfriend to know if you've moved somewhere nearby? Etc.
- philwelch 14y agoSure, why not? If there's anything like that I did care about, Facebook would be none the wiser anyway.