3 ms·

We also know that social connections matter for personal position. It's a zero-sum game and it's shitty that we have to play it, but if you don't get the "who y

We also know that social connections matter for personal position. It's a zero-sum game and it's shitty that we have to play it, but if you don't get the "who you know" game in order, then you can't make use of what you know, and you become yet another bitter, smart underachiever. To clarify-there's capital-C Connections, which have to do with old money and social status, and these are destructive. There are also lowercase-c connections, which is basically knowing people or having friends, and these are a major positive. Without knowing anyone the work you produce will actually be of lesser value, because you may end up doing something no one cares about really well. As an example, I got into Machine Learning through connections about 2 years ago. If I hadn't known anyone I might have spent a lot of time trying to break into classical AI, I-banking, or programming. Instead I knew that Machine Learning was becoming more and more important, so I was able to focus my energy on learning that as opposed to, say, C++.

michaelochurch 14y ago
This is a really strong point. When we talk about "Connections", we're actually often talking about information flow. Capital-C Connections are about the ability to advertise oneself to a set of parasitic people with disproportionate power. As the world wakes up to this emperor having no clothes, this is becoming less important. Look at Mitt Romney's amazement at the fact people who scoff about the "47%" in private (in a world with smart phones and the Internet) can't get elected. That's a push-driven information flow that exists in a time of scarcity. One has to advertise oneself to the few people who are in power. That has been the dominant world for centuries. However, as we move into an era where talent, skill, and know-how are the scarce resources, the more important information flow is pull-driven. The game for an ambitious person is more about finding things out-- what's worth learning, what to work on. So you win by pulling down the best information, not by pushing (low-quality, biased) information about oneself into the streams of others.

michaelochurch 14y ago

This is a really strong point. When we talk about "Connections", we're actually often talking about information flow. Capital-C Connections are about the ability to advertise oneself to a set of parasitic people with disproportionate power. As the world wakes up to this emperor having no clothes, this is becoming less important. Look at Mitt Romney's amazement at the fact people who scoff about the "47%" in private (in a world with smart phones and the Internet) can't get elected. That's a push-driven information flow that exists in a time of scarcity. One has to advertise oneself to the few people who are in power. That has been the dominant world for centuries. However, as we move into an era where talent, skill, and know-how are the scarce resources, the more important information flow is pull-driven. The game for an ambitious person is more about finding things out-- what's worth learning, what to work on. So you win by pulling down the best information, not by pushing (low-quality, biased) information about oneself into the streams of others.