3 ms·
Your error is misunderstanding the premise of science. "Perfect knowledge" has nothing to do with it. Nobody but a fool would claim to have perfect knowledge,
by jlgreco 14y ago
Your error is misunderstanding the premise of science. "Perfect knowledge" has nothing to do with it. Nobody but a fool would claim to have perfect knowledge, or have a system that gives it.
- amalag 14y agoAnother dogma in the name of 'science'.
- jlgreco 14y agoI would be fascinated to hear how you figure that. Literature on the scientific process is all quite clear that the process does not yield perfect knowledge, nor is it supposed to, nor can it. Also this is not a conclusion of science (the scientific process is not meant for such things) but rather epistemology and the philosophy of science.