6 ms·
Unfortunately. It is a shame that the human race tries to progress without the active help of a approximately a quarter of the world population. One can only
by guylhem 14y ago
Unfortunately. It is a shame that the human race tries to progress without the active help of a approximately a quarter of the world population.
One can only hope that islam will see the light like other religions did - yet I doubt that, for it seems even more opposed to science that the other religions were/are. There have been various sects trying to bring the enlightenment to islam, but they more or less have failed. (in fact, I believe Mustapha Kamal in Turkey is one of the only example of success - and even that one was not perfect, with religious persecution of the religious minorities)
There are signs that a united califate (islamist empire) might emerge again - the various revolutions could have been an opportunity for democracy to emerge, but the islamists did dominate. Some serious ideological division between islamists are blocking, but politics does wonder everywhere, and when you notice a peace agreement between sunnis and shias, be very worried.
Maybe it can't be like the pacific fall of communism - maybe it will take a war like the fall of fascism.
The way things are, the west will prevail and so will science - with strong collateral damages however.
It is just a shame to spend so many years and resources for such a pointless confrontation - and that's not even counting the human losses.
At least science and progress will prevail. Too bad it might seriously hurt the current leader of the free world - like it did for France and England in WW2.
BTW for those who will cry wolf and racism, here's a nice facebook page in french : https://www.facebook.com/Athes411 https://www.facebook.com/Athes411 - algerians atheists. Yes, some people in countries dominated by islam do fight for their freedom of conscience and for science to prevail. Odds are against them however.
Science requires a "critical mass" to bear its fruits, or people end up burned or with their heads on sticks - like many did, in the middle ages or the other dark periods of humanity.
Society, in the countries where these people live, is fighting against them and their un-islamic beliefs, there are fewer and fewer of them to make a political difference, while we are offering very little opportunity to leave for greener pastures.
Odds are against them - just like they were against galileo, or the russians who did not believe in communism and saw it for what it was but couldn't manage to flee. Science, facts and all that will certainly win in the end- but meanwhile, it won't do any good for the people stuck in a fight against an angry mob of people, which includes some who sincerely believe they have 40 virgins waiting for them in heaven!
EDIT: Secularism and science do conflate. Just like fascist and communist suppressed research that was against their dogmas, and subsidized stupid theories that played well with their beliefs. In the catholic world there was that thing called "the middle ages" for a reason - and then enlightenment. We are currently in the islamic middle ages. Go read the atheist page - it's worth spending some time on. Their last post from only 2 hours ago even has a nice picture of science as a book/shield to protect against religious dogmas : https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=342402572541947&set=a.293399670775571.67113.292778557504349&type=1&theater https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=342402572541947&...
Downvotes ? Does not matter. True science holds no belief - just paradigms, which can be reversed with enough time, theories and matching evidence. Any form of political or religious belief is good and helpful - until it starts believing that dogmas are better than facts. Then it steers away from the truth. Science is not a body of knowledge, but more a process of thought.
- ComputerGuru 14y agoYour post completely conflates "secularism" and "science." They are not the same.
- rokhayakebe 14y ago"It is a shame that the human race tries to progress without the active help of a approximately a quarter of the world population." "Yes, some people in countries dominated by islam do fight for their freedom of conscience and for science to prevail. ." These two contradict themselves.
- DanBC 14y ago> One can only hope that islam will see the light like other religions did Because it's Islam that hinders scientific education in the US, right? It's Islamic Creationism that's pushed in US science classes; it's Islamists who oppose stem cell research?
- joshuacc 14y agoFWIW, in the US, very few religious people oppose stem cell research as such. The opposition is to using stem cells derived from aborted embryos. The pro-life movement is largely in favor of research on embryonic stem cells obtained in other ways (like from umbilical cord blood.)
- jacquesm 14y agoWhy do people call the 'pro life' movement the pro life movement? They're clearly not pro life, they use that self chosen label as a misdirection. There must be a better way to describe them.
- joshuacc 14y agoBecause it is a good way of referring to the group that believes the issue is fundamentally about human life, as opposed to the group that believes the issue is fundamentally about a woman's choice. I happen to agree with the pro-life side, but both terms are intended to highlight what the respective sides view as the most important aspect of abortion.