4 ms·
It's not contrary at all. It's the same point. The changing mix is merely a difference of degree. The key argument you raise is that discrimination has a cost.
by absherwin 14y ago
It's not contrary at all. It's the same point. The changing mix is merely a difference of degree. The key argument you raise is that discrimination has a cost. I don't have the numbers offhand to determine whether the cost of monitoring exceeds the benefit of higher quality education. Regardless, that's a different argument that should be backed by a different set of data.
- streptomycin 14y agoIt's contrary in that a naive interpretation leads to the opposite conclusion. That's all I meant. And I'm not sure how you define what is a different argument and what isn't. It's all about the value of these scores.