Yeah, this piece is a little misleading. The author is referring to a nuanced difference between ethylene carbonate (EC) and propylene carbonate (PC) in the for

Yeah, this piece is a little misleading. The author is referring to a nuanced difference between ethylene carbonate (EC) and propylene carbonate (PC) in the formation of a protective film around anodes. See this (paywalled) review of electrolyte chemistry: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cr030203g http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/cr030203g http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15669157 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15669157 """ The unique position of EC as a lithium battery electrolyte was established in 1990 when Dahn and co-workers reported the fundamental difference between EC and PC in their effects on the reversibility of lithium ion intercalation/deintercalation with graphitic anodes.36 Despite the seemingly minute difference in molecular structure between the two, EC was found to form an effective protective film (SEI) on a graphitic anode that prevented any sustained electrolyte decomposition on the anode, while this protection could not be realized with PC and the graphene structure eventually disintegrated in a process termed “exfoliation” because of PC cointercalation. The reason for the effectiveness of the SEI has incited a lot of research interest in the past decade but remains an unsolved mystery, although it is generally believed that EC undergoes a reduction process on the carbonaceous anode via a similar path to that shown in Scheme 1. Because of the important role this SEI plays in lithium ion chemistry, the research efforts on this topic will be reviewed in a dedicated section (section 6). """