4 ms·
I'm not certain that you appreciate how crucial and widespread native email clients are in the business and academic worlds, both on the desktop and on mobile d
by PommeDeTerre 14y ago
I'm not certain that you appreciate how crucial and widespread native email clients are in the business and academic worlds, both on the desktop and on mobile devices.
Maybe these users do have personal Hotmail or Gmail accounts. However, for anything serious and work-related, they're very likely using Outlook, Lotus Notes, Mail.app, Thunderbird, or one of the numerous other native email clients.
Many people, especially those in management, sales, accounting, finance or other communication-heavy areas of business, often spend many hours each workday using a native email client, on both the desktop and on mobile devices.
Within technical and academic circles, and also the open source community, many people prefer native email clients because they're so much more powerful than the web-based clients.
Furthermore, I personally know a lot of people who have an @gmail.com account, but they essentially always use it from a native client via IMAP and SMTP, rather than using the web interface. They use it mainly because it's free, and because of its large storage space, rather than because of its web interface.
- jiggy2011 14y agoThe netflix example is interesting. I recently installed with super-hacky Netflix for Ubuntu PPA (works surprisingly well, but can cause your screensaver to activate). It's basically just windows firefox wrapped in a custom version of wine. The important thing though is that it launches fullscreen and attaches to the unity dock as an independent application whereas with Windows it's just a website that you browse to. I think that the way it integrates on Ubuntu actually makes much more sense in many ways. Though VLC integration would obviously be the most superior option.